2. Archive
  3. 2017
  4. №2
  5. PHYTOTECHNOLOGIES FOR URBAN WATER BODIES PROTECTION

PHYTOTECHNOLOGIES FOR URBAN WATER BODIES PROTECTION

Section

Environmental Safety Construction and Town Economy

Title

PHYTOTECHNOLOGIES FOR URBAN WATER BODIES PROTECTION

Сontributors

V. D. Kazmiruk, Cand. of Geog. Sc., Researcher at the Water Problems Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.,

Т. N. Kazmiruk, Cand. of Tech. Sc., Researcher at the Water Problems Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract

The role of natural and constructed wetlands for urban water bodies’ protection from contaminations is considered. Higher aquatic plants on the bottom or in the offshore zone of streams or lakes allow protect them from contaminations, which come with washing, melting or storm waters from urban areas, highways and railways. Furthermore, macrophytes improve water quality inside water bodies and catalyze them self-treatment functions. The phytotechnologies are spatially effective for prevention water bodies from contaminations, such as, plastics, other solid wastes, and higher plant debris. These methods are effective and economic profitable for disinfecting and treating waster water which have oil and oil products, synthetic surface-active matters, nutrients sulfates, heave metals, and str.

Keywords

phytotechnologies, natural and constructed wetlands, macrophytes, waster water.

References

1. Introduction to Phytoremediation. Cincinnati (OH), 2000. 104 p. (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency; EPA/600/R-99/107).

2. Miksch K., Cema G., Corvini P. F.-X., Felis E., Sochacki A., Surmacz-Gorska J., Wiszniowski J., Za- bczynski S. R & D priorities in the field of sustainable remediation and purification of agro-industrial and municipal wastewater // New Biotechnology. — 2015. — Vol. 32. — No. 1. — P. 128—132.

3. UNEP Standard. Phytotechnology and Ecotechnology. Manual for designing, constructing and operating. Brussels, — 2000. — 370 p.

4. Brekhovskikh V. F., Kazmiruk V. D., Vishnevskaya G. N. Biota in the mass transfer process in water bod-ies. Moscow: Nauka Press, — 2008. — 315 p.

5. Kazmiruk V. D., Kazmiruk T. N., Brekhovskikh V. F. Overgrown streams and reservoirs: Dynamic proc-esses of formation of bottom sediments. Moscow: Nauka Press, — 2004. — 310 p.

6. Kazmiruk V. D., Kazmiruk T. N. Natural barriers for heavy metals delivery to the Caspian Sea // Modern Energy-saving Technologies and Agricultural Production Systems. Ryazan, — 2013. — P. 486—493.

7. Kazmiruk V. D., Kazmiruk T. N. Using phytoremediation for water protection in Russia and the world // Water Disaster: Danger, Predictability, Management and Prevention of Threats. Novocherkassk, — 2013. — P. 332—337.

8. Kazmiruk V. D. Hydraulic resistances of higher aquatic vegetation // Water Recourses. — 1990. — Vol. 17. — No. 1. — P. 101—108.

9. Kazmiruk V. D. Phytoremediation for water protection: unlimited possibilities and potential limitations // Modern Energy-saving Technologies and Agricultural Production Systems. Ryazan, — 2013. — P. 494—501.

10. Kazmiruk V. D. Modern tendency of use phytoremediation in water protection // International Conference on Problems of Complex Arrangement Technogene Systems. Moscow, — 2013. — P. 109—114.

11. Fukuhara H., Nemoto F., Takeuchi Y., Nobushige T. Nitrate dynamics in a reed belt of a shallow sand dune lake in Japan: Analysis of nitrate retention using stable nitrogen isotope ratios // Hydrobiology. —

2007. — Vol. 584. — No. 1. — P. 49—58.

12. Kurata A. Utilization of lagoon ecosystem in nutrient removal from the inflowing waters to the lake // Conservation and management of lakes. — Budapest, — 1989. — P. 109—116.