Section |
Urban Planningand Rural Planning |
Title |
ECOLOGICAL-ECONOMIC AND NOOSPHERIC DEVELOPMENT OF MUNICIPAL FORMATIONS OF RUSSIA |
Сontributors |
B.I. Kochurov, D. of Geog. Sc., Dr. Habil., Professor, Leading Researcher at the Institute of Geography of Russian Academy of Sciences, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; N. V. Fomina, Postgraduate Student at the Moscow City Teacher Training University, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., O.N. Prin, Postgraduate Student at the KozmaMinin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University — “Minin University”, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., L. G. Lobkovskaya, Cand. of Geog. Sc., Researcher at the Institute of Geography Russian Academy of Sciences, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Yu. A. Haziahmetova, Cand. of Geog. Sc., Researcher at the Institute of Geography Russian Academy of Sciences, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., V. A. Lobkovsky, Cand. of Geog. Sc., Researcher at the Russian Academy of Sciences, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
Abstract |
This article is devoted to environmental problems of local self-government on the example of a number of municipal entities. Questions are considered which approaches exist to determine the ecological state, whether it is possible to simultaneously develop the economy and preserve and multiply the natural and resource potential, what kind of environmental policy should be, and can the doctrine of the noosphere become the basis for the development of the municipal formation? A complex of organizational, economic, legal and institutional measures to improve the mechanism of management of municipalities is formulated. There is a significant need to activate the local community in the management of municipalities. |
Keywords |
municipalities, environmental conditions, ecological-economic balance, environmental policy, the noospheric approach. |
References |
1. The Ukase of the President of RF from 01.04.1996 № 440 “About the Concept of Transition of the Russian Federation to Sustainable Development”. 2. Federal Law № 131-FZ of 06.10.2003 “On General Principles of Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation” // RossiyskayaGazeta. 2003, October 8th. 3. Kochurov B. I. Ecodiagnostics and Balanced Development / B. I. Kochurov. — Moscow—Smolensk: Magenta, 2003. — 384 p. 4. Kochurov B. I., Rozanov L. L., Nazarevsky N. V. Principles and Criteria for Determining the Territory of Ecological Disasters // Proc. RAS. Ser. Geography, — 1993. — № 5. — P. 67—76. 5. Krivov A. V. Ecological and Economic Balance and Sustainable Development of the Local Territory (on the Example of the Torbeevsky District of the Republic of Mordovia): author's abstract. Dis. Cand. Geogr. Sciences. M., 2009. — 22 p. 6. Lobkovskaya L. G. Geoecological Assessment of the Administrative Region According to Statistics and Sociological Research // Regional Enviromental Issues. — 2005. — № 1. — P. 38—49. 7. Orlinsky A. S. Ecological and Economic Balance and Sustainable Development of the Rostov Region: the author's abstract. Dis. Cand. Geogr. Sciences. Rostov-on-Don, 2006. — 23 p. 8. Merkulov P. I., Varfolomeev A. F., Merkulova S. V., Lyugzaev A. V., Saygushkina T. A. Analysis of Land Use Structure of the Territory of the Republic of Mordovia // South of Russia: Ecology, Development. — 2007. - № 3. - P. 76-83. 9. Kochurov B. I., Ivanov Yu. G. Approaches to the Theory of Land Management // Regional Enviromental Issues. — 1998. — № 3. — P. 114—120. 10. Kochurov B. I., Ivanov Yu. G. Noospheric Approach to the Organization of Territory // Geography and Natural Resources. — 1991. — No. 3. — P. 124—132. 11. Kochurov B. I., Ivashkina I. V. Developing Stability of Urban Landscapes and Technogenic Objects of a Large City // Ecology of Urban Areas. — 2016. — No. 3. — P. 47—53. |